stephank:

out-there-on-the-maroon:

pilgrimkitty:

castielsteenwolf:

pr1nceshawn:

The evolution of Halloween costumes for girls…

this is really important

My best friend has a one-year-old daughter. They were buying her first Halloween costume, and they had to get her a boys’ costume because all the infant and toddler costumes for girls had been sexy-fied. They were disgusted. We’re talking about little babies here.

1) This is gross and very important to see. So glad my mommy started me on the “make your costume via a combination of mommy’s sewing and strategic trips to the thrift shop” thing young, because I missed a lot of awkward. 

2) I want that grumpy baby devil OMG LOOKIT HER OMG LITTLE BLOB OF EVIL AWWWWWWWW SOMEONE DO A COMIC ABOUT HER OMG.

This makes me profoundly uncomfortable. As it should. This is weird and wrong and these costume companies need to cut this shit out.

The ones used for the adult women are, for the most part, lingerie. Please stop using lingerie as examples of women’s costumes being overly sexy for no reason.
I’m sure you can find accusing costumes to make your point.
And if you can’t, then logic would dictate the point is unnecessary. But like I said, I’m sure you can find actual costumes that illustrate your point just as well.

157,279 notes

itsb0sstime:

georgia-dream:

if your boyfriend is your best friend, you’re doing it right.

if your boyfriend is your only friend, you’re doing it wrong.

THANK. YOU.

44,324 notes

abbiegoth:

Please tell me I’m not the only person in the LGBTQA+ community who gets annoyed when other LGBTQA+ people bitch about how allies are useless and that we don’t need them??

Like… Yeah I get that you’re mad at the oppressors in power who don’t want you to get your rights, but…

42 notes

Well that seems like a bad idea.

Well that seems like a bad idea.

(Source: teenagemum)

207,259 notes

redninjakitty14-fanfictions:

hiowl:

missmania244:

eatfithappiness:

epic-humor:

Animals Growing Up

Cuz who wouldn’t want this on their dash

The turtle one

If this doesn’t make ur day better u are wrong and you can go

i need more of these

(Source: tastefullyoffensive)

1,198,584 notes

4gottendaughter:

thethirdharris:

priceofliberty:

wetmattos:

pokemoneggs:

THIS IS HOW THE BRITISH PRESS RESPONDS TO THE KILLINGS OF DISABLED CHILDREN. All of these extracts were taken from UK news websites. the final tweet is in response to a now-deleted tweet from politician Sandy Kaylan, who praised a mother for ‘euthanising’ her infant children

tania Clarence, 43, admitted to smothering three of her children, all of whom suffered from physical disabilities. Regardless of the circumstances that led to their tragic deaths, these methods of reporting are unethical and go against the British editors code of practice - which states that, once proceedings are active, the press cannot publish any material that could create substantial risk of prejudice in court. The language used in these articles (“tragic mum”, “the unbearable burden of care”, putting the word murder in scare quotes, etc) does exactly that. Reading these articles, it is clear who we are meant to “side” with.

that these rules on court proceedings are apparently not applicable to cases involving the killing of disabled children shows how little the British press (and by extension, the public) cares about the welfare of disabled people in this country. Calling these children burdens and implying they deserved to die reinforces ableism and makes the world a more dangerous place for disabled people. Yet the press does not count it as encouraging prejudice. maybe it’s because we believe the unlawful killing of disabled infants does not “count” as a real crime

This is abhorrent.

source

The utopia of britain

this is how the media responds to women that murder their children

9,380 notes